Mulholland Drive

A chilling drama that kept me up at night and forced me to think. I really gave the film my utmost attention, and I was desperate not to miss the slightest detail that might then cost me a shred of explanation. Up to about the 110th minute, everything is understandable, but what takes place in the final scenes is something unbelievable, completely incomprehensible to me (though I felt at times that there were some clues to an explanation, ultimately I was "disappointed" in this respect) and fascinating. For another half hour after the closing credits, I remained sitting on the couch, staring dully at the DVD menu screen. For a moment I considered playing it again. :) Bottom line – David Lynch is the man, so very much the man, the direction is absolutely amazing, as is the music, sound, cinematography, and actors. A totally unique and almost "otherworldly" cinematic experience. (2009-05-03)

Mulholland Drive is not a film for viewers who need a clearly defined script, want answers, and a clear resolution. It is, on the other hand, suitable for those who like to play, enjoy a mysterious atmosphere, and possess a good dose of imagination and creativity. Mulholland Drive is primarily a typically Lynchian game with genres and pop-cultural references, featuring excellent music, great acting performances, precise editing, and interesting cinematography. It’s a film that made Naomi Watts a major star. Overall impression: 95%. Along with the much darker Lost Highway, it's probably Lynch's best work. (2007-09-24)

I can't help it, but I guess I've seen too many Lynch films in too short of a time, which leads to the fact that I don't like "Mulholland Drive" as much as I could. But when I watch this film, I see elements from all of Lynch's previous works that he has directed. There is something from "Twin Peaks", there is something from "Lost Highway", from "Blue Velvet" and also a certain intensity from "Wild at Heart". It's great that Lynch maintains his style, that it's still him, but his mind games are rather painful for me. The craziest thing is that there are people here trying to analyze the film with the belief that there is a clear explanation of what we're watching. With Lynch's films (especially the recent ones, except for "The Straight Story"), there is simply no key. It's not about understanding what the director meant, but simply taking something from the film, finding your own path, but not expecting that yours is the only correct one. Lynch is brilliant in this respect, but he is also repetitive in this aspect. (2014-03-19)

A psycho(il)logical and strange picture that is hard to grasp... So, in fact, the type of classic that we are used to getting from Lynch. If it had ended twenty minutes earlier, this would have been maybe the most graspable Lynch movie ever, but at that moment is breaks into the most bizarre movie ever. Lynch on his best film-making (not series-making!) form. (2012-05-12)

As a series, it might not be bad. Yet as a standalone film, it rides the wave of films with unreliable narrators, and that perpetual dreamlike atmosphere and the combination of Lynch and his favorite films just makes for a new collage. However, the latent Sapphic themes and the crush on the Paramount gate are elements I’m always interested in. (2016-10-23)