The Collector

Fans of brutal gore combined with inhuman-human torture and Saw-like traps will surely enjoy it, as will fans of dense atmosphere and rhythmic horror music, but also supporters of rational thinking who like to amuse themselves over the idiotic twists of similar genre pieces. I actually enjoyed a good two-thirds of The Collector; the mysterious plot in the background teased my curiosity, and the bloody violent scenes had the primary effect of adding to the bleak and oppressive atmosphere, so they can't be faulted. On top of that, Josh Stewart is quite likeable, he behaves more or less reasonably considering the situation, and I was really rooting for him in his hopeless endeavour (I enjoyed the absurdity of two people constantly not running into each other in a medium-sized house). However, the film has huge holes in the logic not only of the story as a whole (how did he manage to decorate the whole house in a couple of hours?), but also of individual scenes (clichés again), and especially in the mishandled ending, which is text-book unnecessary, derailing the previous build-up and creative expression. I'm going to watch the second one anyway, because I'm still very curious about the meaning of the killer's actions. 65% (2014-03-17)

Yes, "The Collector" is undoubtedly a film that tries to make an impression, it is a film for effect, but that doesn't change the fact that the right effect will actually be achieved. It's raw, it's depressive, it's disgusting, and that's exactly how it was supposed to be. Furthermore, within the genre, the film is quite imaginative and doesn't settle for just letting people die. "The Collector" is not strictly innovative, but still gives you the feeling that it injects some new blood into the genre. And there is not exactly a shortage of that blood. (2014-01-24)

Home Alone with a twist; here the thief is the savior from a far worse guest. You can never have too many inventive "trap" movies, and the screenwriter of the middle instalments of the Saw franchise cannot be denied, but I have to admit that the older I get, the harder "torture porn" movies get to sit through, especially when there is an overabundance of fishing hooks in them. A solid horror flick, but one and done for me. (2021-05-01)

I don't give a fuck about some logic and I honestly don't care how much an adult Kevin McAllister could spread around a house in two hours just to get it in there. What irks me more is how the film tries to be enlightened and innovative in the slasher genre and ends up piling on the same bunch of clichés that don't define this subgenre (get a clue already), but instead relegate it to the level of the already seen a billion times. There's that horny teenage duo again, there's that stupid hope in the arrival of a cop, there's that ending sucked out of a finger or something. Oh well. (2013-01-20)

Home Alone (in hardcore mode) mashed up with the best of the Saw series. I can't go below 4 stars just for creating such an iconic villain that the viewer learns nothing substantial about the entire time (except that he revels in traps, torture, and murder). Within the subgenre of "butchery made for a few bucks" (cf. 3 million), this is a very well done little hell.[75%] (2021-08-31)