Vantage Point

Vantage Point has such dynamic direction that I momentarily forgot about my prejudices toward action movies and even considered giving it five stars. But as the minutes went by, the simplicity of the film started to surface, with the script piling up one cliché after another and logical holes appearing in the plot. The moment when the kidnapped American president bravely started fighting with terrorists ultimately led me to give it a mere three stars. Nevertheless, it's not below average, as the film has a fast pace and offers a number of thrilling scenes. Overall impression: 65%. (2009-04-24)

A fun bite-sized snack that greatly entertained me for about an hour and a half, but its quirkiness bothers me. It doesn't hold back on adrenaline, nor on good actors, but I would have enjoyed it much more if it had truly been the originally intended script for a full-length 24 movie, and if I could have found common ground with the main character (in this case Bauer). As it is, it remains effectively, but excessively loosely designed trauma. The direction is brisk, the interweaving of characters and storylines is sufficient, but only a few moments and the current culmination of all perspectives stayed in my mind. (2008-07-13)

It's perfectly heroic, overwhelmingly pro-American, and predictable in detail. Yet given the ridiculous money spent on it, the director got it moving in a high-octane style that doesn't let up whatsoever. And when you cast Dennis Quaid, Matthew Fox, and Edgar Ramirez as uncompromising tough guys with guns in their hands, you can't go wrong. I’m very satisfied and it gets a strong 3 ½ stars from me. I will definitely watch it again, especially given its short runtime. (2009-08-03)

This film would be more than above-average entertainment if it didn't borrow so brutally from all possible action flicks of recent years: a weapon like in The Jackal, quickly edited, dynamic chases like in the Bourne films (the action music was so obvious that for a moment I thought it was a Powell advertisement), a bomb madness like in Kingdom (debris, sound effects, echoes, dirt), and so on. But for forty million dollars, I don't think more could have been done, and the material is squeezed to the maximum. What is disappointing the unrealistic shooting and the somewhat second-rate villain, whose compromise couldn’t be more predictable, and even a moron can see at that moment what the ending will be like. (2008-08-24)

I've been thinking about the rating for a long time, but in the end I'll be good again and give this film a thumbs up – Vantage Point doesn’t deserve to be slagged. It's true that from a filmmaking point of view it doesn't bring anything new and the serious premise is unpleasantly distorted by American exaggeration and jingoism, but for the ordinary popcorn viewer this film is a feast for which it's definitely worth making space and time. A big plus is the adequate runtime, which keeps the director constantly on his heels and forces him to keep a high speed, and then of course the actors around Quaid and Whitaker, whose roles may not have any great depth, but every viewer feels immediately more comfortable when looking at their faces. But I can say that I would have felt just as satisfied maybe even with a bunch of unknown actors, because Travis managed to create a very unpretentious and entertaining thriller that will probably make you change your mind if you ever want to be president. (2013-01-21)