Jumper: Franchir le temps

To tell the truth, the Jumper universe idea intrigued me from the moment I heard about it. A great topic, but the same doesn’t apply to the screenplay (and who knows, maybe not to the novel either). Plus, Liman’s central storyline falls apart in his hands, but I have no idea why. It’s as if got carried away with the historical monuments and the beautiful shots of exotic locations and I don’t wish to get into that dumbly constructed romantic storyline, but rather concentrate on the main reasons why this movie was made (I mean of course the “jumping" and the Paladins). The acting performances aren’t up to much either. It was like Christensen was playing a fifteen-year-old (either on purpose or he was just that bad, no matter), Rachel Bilson is just for decoration and Samuel L. Jackson should have shaved his head (he could at least command a little respect). I think that just Jamie Bell endured it all without serious damage to his (and my) soul. But enough criticism. The movie contains quite a lot of good scenes worth seeing and as a spring snack, Jumper is still pleasantly digestible. But if they’re planning a sequel, I strongly recommend trying a new screenwriter. (2008-03-20)

"...and so I jumped for the first time...." But what came out of it? For adventure-seeking teenagers, it was definitely a delightful experience and a fulfilled dream, but for others, it was a slightly hesitant breather with forever young Hayden, adorable Rachel Bilson, and reliable Jackson. And unfortunately, also with unfinished, or rather just lightly touched upon mythology (see the story of the Paladin hunter, which ends almost before it begins). I admit that I enjoyed it because the weak half an hour and a half flies by very quickly, and with a bunch of money, Liman managed to make it really very visible, but judging from the hesitant box office results, I wasn't the only one who wasn't very bothered that there won't be a continuation. (2008-04-10)

The script was probably written according to the manual "How to write an 80-minute plot without breaking a sweat," and Hayden's a one-dimensional wooden actor. A very weak result for Doug Liman, short and rather dull silly stuff for MTV kids out of school. Thanks at least for Jamie Bell, who brought some adrenaline and dynamism to the story and compared to the bland Christensen looks like a rhododendron next to a dead cactus. (2008-06-12)

"Jumper" is a movie whose title caught my attention when I first heard it. In 2003, I wrote a short story called "Skokan" ("Jumper" in English). When I was thinking about what it would be called in English, it would be exactly "Jumper." When I finally watched the movie, I found out that it was based on a slightly different source, which was written by Steven Gould in 1992. Hayden Christensen played a young man who can jump in space and move from place to place through teleportation. The idea is nice, but the execution is a bit worse. The film tries to be cool, so it is action-packed, Samuel L. Jackson has a great look, but that's where it ends. Once a stupid connection with faith is introduced, the film lacks any real meaning and it becomes just a fight between the powerful against the oppressed. The allegory, in this case, doesn't bring much. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/04/jumper-babel-kung-fu-divocina-miami.html (2013-02-17)

Jumper is a completely empty and silly flick. It’s like an hour and a half of watching a nicely decorated aquarium without any fish in it. The creators didn’t see their idea through even halfway to the end and the only cool thing about the film is Samuel L. Jackson’s hairstyle. Unsuitable for viewers over 18. (2008-02-13)