Beowulf

A naively simple story with a classic narrative that relies solely on its breathtaking visuals. Fortunately, they work, and although there will certainly be naysayers who claim that “it’s not proper”, technology is once again a step further, and perfection is only a little – or rather a few years – away. Zemeckis may not be a very skillful director, but he is not afraid to experiment, pursue his own vision, and play with the material. And even though this banal bloody fairytale is easily forgettable due to its flat plot, the heroic music and captivating visuals won't fade from memory so easily. The question then remains, to what extent is this a relevant “film” argument. (2008-07-26)

The action sections are reminiscent of a slightly above-average computer game intro (although even here the creators could learn a lot, for example from the intro of The Witcher), the characters are inhumanely bulbous, the horses roll like fates, and the moments when emotions are supposed to radiate from the animation completely miss the mark. Which is actually a shame, because otherwise Beowulf is quite a nice and surprisingly not entirely clichéd heroic epic – if it is judged by the standards of Hollywood. It has decent music and a good atmosphere in places, but the animation absolutely fails with regard to reviving the world "offscreen". Beowulf is a horribly narrow film that lives only in a small section of the camera; otherwise, it resembles an indifferent thing that fatally lacks persuasiveness. (2009-06-10)

Effort is good and it definitely counts, but the fact that it is a 3D animated film where the characters look quite realistic is not a factor that would really throw me off. I remember not liking it even in the cinema, and after watching it a second time, I can only confirm this. There are great action scenes, but they don't redeem it overall. (2015-03-11)

Beowulf is visually stunning in all respects, with great music by Alan Silvestri, whether spectacular or dark, in Angelina Jolie’s cave. Also, the atmosphere of the film is so thick that it could be cut with a knife and the violence, sex and the overall maturity of the film are major pluses. These aspects make Beowulf an original and much livelier animated movie than the childish Polar Express. But there is one big but... these digital pictures just don’t have heart, no matter how hard they try. And at the moments when there is no Anthony Hopkins, Angelina or some monster, there’s nothing to watch. If Robert Zemeckis mastered the heart of digital animation, he might make better movies than Pixar. But he still has a lot to learn. (2008-01-07)

Just like the hero Beowulf, despite his bravery, is ultimately a toy in the hands of unpredictable fate, the transfer of his story to the big screen is a toy for Zemeckis and his team. A toy that is enticing for the audience and almost irresistible for some. However, it is unattainable for most of them. The creators played with it for so long that it became usable only for their own enjoyment. The race in the sea, the battle with the dragon, or the camera flyover from the king's hall to Grendel are scenes that will stay in my mind for months, but the story itself was shamefully lost among them. After all, Beowulf is an ancient legend that has inspired many famous works of fantasy. So why does it rely almost exclusively on pathetic speeches or vulgar (meaning crudely rough for the time) outbursts in the first half? I don't know if I would want to see a determined warrior in a live-action version, as such blunders would be even more pronounced. Additionally, despite the animation "filter," the actors are truly excellent, Winstone has charisma to spare, and even Alison Lohman, despite having limited screen time, can brighten up the fading ending with her traditional gentle beauty. But I still trust Zemeckis. I just can't shake off the fear that he won't ultimately deliver that perfectly combined story with revolutionary animation. (2007-12-21)